↓ Skip to main content

An engineered non-oxidative glycolysis pathway for acetone production in Escherichia coli

Overview of attention for article published in Biotechnology Techniques, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
An engineered non-oxidative glycolysis pathway for acetone production in Escherichia coli
Published in
Biotechnology Techniques, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10529-016-2115-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaoyan Yang, Qianqian Yuan, Yangyang Zheng, Hongwu Ma, Tao Chen, Xueming Zhao

Abstract

To find new metabolic engineering strategies to improve the yield of acetone in Escherichia coli. Results of flux balance analysis from a modified Escherichia coli genome-scale metabolic network suggested that the introduction of a non-oxidative glycolysis (NOG) pathway would improve the theoretical acetone yield from 1 to 1.5 mol acetone/mol glucose. By inserting the fxpk gene encoding phosphoketolase from Bifidobacterium adolescentis into the genome, we constructed a NOG pathway in E.coli. The resulting strain produced 47 mM acetone from glucose under aerobic conditions in shake-flasks. The yield of acetone was improved from 0.38 to 0.47 mol acetone/mol glucose which is a significant over the parent strain. Guided by computational analysis of metabolic networks, we introduced a NOG pathway into E. coli and increased the yield of acetone, which demonstrates the importance of modeling analysis for the novel metabolic engineering strategies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 49 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 22%
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Student > Master 7 14%
Researcher 7 14%
Professor 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 12 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 10%
Chemical Engineering 3 6%
Engineering 3 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 13 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,960,052
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology Techniques
#775
of 2,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,139
of 312,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology Techniques
#4
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,762 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,451 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.