↓ Skip to main content

Feasibility of Ultra-Rapid Exome Sequencing in Critically Ill Infants and Children With Suspected Monogenic Conditions in the Australian Public Health Care System

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
133 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
164 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Feasibility of Ultra-Rapid Exome Sequencing in Critically Ill Infants and Children With Suspected Monogenic Conditions in the Australian Public Health Care System
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, June 2020
DOI 10.1001/jama.2020.7671
Pubmed ID
Authors

Australian Genomics Health Alliance Acute Care Flagship, Sebastian Lunke, Stefanie Eggers, Meredith Wilson, Chirag Patel, Christopher P. Barnett, Jason Pinner, Sarah A. Sandaradura, Michael F. Buckley, Emma I. Krzesinski, Michelle G. de Silva, Gemma R. Brett, Kirsten Boggs, David Mowat, Edwin P. Kirk, Lesley C. Adès, Lauren S. Akesson, David J. Amor, Samantha Ayres, Anne Baxendale, Sarah Borrie, Alessandra Bray, Natasha J. Brown, Cheng Yee Chan, Belinda Chong, Corrina Cliffe, Martin B. Delatycki, Matthew Edwards, George Elakis, Michael C. Fahey, Andrew Fennell, Lindsay Fowles, Lyndon Gallacher, Megan Higgins, Katherine B. Howell, Lauren Hunt, Matthew F. Hunter, Kristi J. Jones, Sarah King, Smitha Kumble, Sarah Lang, Maelle Le Moing, Alan Ma, Dean Phelan, Michael C. J. Quinn, Anna Richards, Christopher M. Richmond, Jessica Riseley, Jonathan Rodgers, Rani Sachdev, Simon Sadedin, Luregn J. Schlapbach, Janine Smith, Amanda Springer, Natalie B. Tan, Tiong Y. Tan, Suzanna L. Temple, Christiane Theda, Anand Vasudevan, Susan M. White, Alison Yeung, Ying Zhu, Melissa Martyn, Stephanie Best, Tony Roscioli, John Christodoulou, Zornitza Stark

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 133 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 163 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 18 11%
Student > Master 17 10%
Researcher 17 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 64 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 31 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 71 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 111. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2021.
All research outputs
#376,395
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#4,450
of 36,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,997
of 434,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#186
of 430 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,434 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 430 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.