| Title |
Revealed stochastic preference: a synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Economic Theory, August 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00199-004-0495-3 |
| Authors |
Daniel L. McFadden |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 5% |
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 101 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 26% |
| Researcher | 24 | 22% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 20% |
| Unknown | 8 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 47 | 42% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 8% |
| Mathematics | 5 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 20% |
| Unknown | 14 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2021.
All research outputs
#3,872,193
of 25,769,258 outputs
Outputs from Economic Theory
#18
of 406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,721
of 69,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Economic Theory
#2
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,769,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 406 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 69,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.