↓ Skip to main content

Evolving the process of a virtual composer

Overview of attention for article published in Natural Computing, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
Title
Evolving the process of a virtual composer
Published in
Natural Computing, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11047-016-9561-6
Authors

Csaba Sulyok, Andrew McPherson, Christopher Harte

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 25%
Lecturer 2 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Other 2 17%
Unknown 1 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 7 58%
Engineering 3 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2016.
All research outputs
#15,377,214
of 22,876,619 outputs
Outputs from Natural Computing
#84
of 144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#211,506
of 338,929 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Natural Computing
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,876,619 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 144 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,929 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them