| Title |
Why is it difficult to implement e-health initiatives? A qualitative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-6-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elizabeth Murray, Joanne Burns, Carl May, Tracy Finch, Catherine O'Donnell, Paul Wallace, Frances Mair |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| Spain | 2 | 13% |
| Belgium | 1 | 6% |
| Ireland | 1 | 6% |
| Mexico | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 56% |
| Scientists | 4 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 534 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 10 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 11 | 2% |
| Unknown | 496 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 96 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 83 | 16% |
| Researcher | 72 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 45 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 29 | 5% |
| Other | 121 | 23% |
| Unknown | 88 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 113 | 21% |
| Computer Science | 68 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 67 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 48 | 9% |
| Psychology | 41 | 8% |
| Other | 98 | 18% |
| Unknown | 99 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2018.
All research outputs
#2,635,550
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#532
of 1,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,993
of 198,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,812 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.