You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Facet Personality and Surface-Level Diversity as Team Mental Model Antecedents: Implications for Implicit Coordination
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Psychology, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1037/a0027851 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
David M. Fisher, Suzanne T. Bell, Erich C. Dierdorff, James A. Belohlav |
| Abstract |
Team mental models (TMMs) have received much attention as important drivers of effective team processes and performance. Less is known about the factors that give rise to these shared cognitive structures. We examined potential antecedents of TMMs, with a specific focus on team composition variables, including various facets of personality and surface-level diversity. Further, we examined implicit coordination as an important outcome of TMMs. Results suggest that team composition in terms of the cooperation facet of agreeableness and racial diversity were significantly related to team-focused TMM similarity. TMM similarity was also positively predictive of implicit coordination, which mediated the relationship between TMM similarity and team performance. Post hoc analyses revealed a significant interaction between the trust facet of agreeableness and racial diversity in predicting TMM similarity. Results are discussed in terms of facilitating the emergence of TMMs and corresponding implications for team-related human resource practices. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 291 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 280 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 85 | 29% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 35 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 28 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 8% |
| Professor | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 54 | 19% |
| Unknown | 48 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Business, Management and Accounting | 106 | 36% |
| Psychology | 86 | 30% |
| Social Sciences | 17 | 6% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 2% |
| Engineering | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 5% |
| Unknown | 52 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2016.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Psychology
#2,358
of 3,366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,453
of 250,087 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Psychology
#40
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,366 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,087 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.