You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reassessing Shark-Driven Trophic Cascades on Coral Reefs: A Reply to Ruppert et al.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Trends in Ecology & Evolution, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.tree.2016.05.005 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
George Roff, Christopher Doropoulos, Alice Rogers, Yves-Marie Bozec, Nils C. Krueck, Eleanor Aurellado, Mark Priest, Chico Birrell, Peter J. Mumby |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 26% |
| Australia | 3 | 13% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Guam | 1 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 61% |
| Scientists | 7 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Singapore | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 89 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 21% |
| Researcher | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 22 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 45 | 49% |
| Environmental Science | 20 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Engineering | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 23 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2019.
All research outputs
#1,911,000
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#1,082
of 3,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,639
of 353,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Trends in Ecology & Evolution
#14
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.