↓ Skip to main content

Global Urban Growth and the Geography of Water Availability, Quality, and Delivery

Overview of attention for article published in Ambio, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
131 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
226 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Global Urban Growth and the Geography of Water Availability, Quality, and Delivery
Published in
Ambio, May 2011
DOI 10.1007/s13280-011-0152-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert I McDonald, Ian Douglas, Carmen Revenga, Rebecca Hale, Nancy Grimm, Jenny Grönwall, Balazs Fekete

Abstract

Globally, urban growth will add 1.5 billion people to cities by 2030, making the difficult task of urban water provisions even more challenging. In this article, we develop a conceptual framework of urban water provision as composed of three axes: water availability, water quality, and water delivery. For each axis, we calculate quantitative proxy measures for all cities with more than 50,000 residents, and then briefly discuss the strategies cities are using in response if they are deficient on one of the axes. We show that 523 million people are in cities where water availability may be an issue, 890 million people are in cities where water quality may be an issue, and 1.3 billion people are in cities where water delivery may be an issue. Tapping into groundwater is a widespread response, regardless of the management challenge, with many cities unsustainably using this resource. The strategies used by cities deficient on the water delivery axis are different than for cities deficient on the water quantity or water quality axis, as lack of financial resources pushes cities toward a different and potentially less effective set of strategies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 226 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 3%
Colombia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Iran, Islamic Republic of 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 209 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 15%
Researcher 32 14%
Professor 13 6%
Student > Bachelor 13 6%
Other 33 15%
Unknown 55 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 66 29%
Engineering 23 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 22 10%
Social Sciences 17 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 6%
Other 19 8%
Unknown 66 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2012.
All research outputs
#13,017,306
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from Ambio
#1,307
of 1,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,602
of 110,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ambio
#5
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,619 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 110,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.