You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Genetically Distinct Subsets within ANCA-Associated Vasculitis
|
---|---|
Published in |
New England Journal of Medicine, July 2012
|
DOI | 10.1056/nejmoa1108735 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Paul A Lyons, Tim F Rayner, Sapna Trivedi, Julia U Holle, Richard A Watts, David R W Jayne, Bo Baslund, Paul Brenchley, Annette Bruchfeld, Afzal N Chaudhry, Jan Willem Cohen Tervaert, Panos Deloukas, Conleth Feighery, Wolfgang L Gross, Loic Guillevin, Iva Gunnarsson, Lorraine Harper, Zdenka Hrušková, Mark A Little, Davide Martorana, Thomas Neumann, Sophie Ohlsson, Sandosh Padmanabhan, Charles D Pusey, Alan D Salama, Jan-Stephan F Sanders, Caroline O Savage, Mårten Segelmark, Coen A Stegeman, Vladimir Tesař, Augusto Vaglio, Stefan Wieczorek, Benjamin Wilde, Jochen Zwerina, Andrew J Rees, David G Clayton, Kenneth G C Smith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 8 | 21% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 8% |
Mexico | 3 | 8% |
France | 2 | 5% |
Spain | 1 | 3% |
Japan | 1 | 3% |
Saudi Arabia | 1 | 3% |
Australia | 1 | 3% |
Dominican Republic | 1 | 3% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Unknown | 15 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 23 | 59% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 10 | 26% |
Scientists | 4 | 10% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 421 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
Germany | 3 | <1% |
Japan | 3 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Philippines | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 407 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 67 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 50 | 12% |
Other | 39 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 38 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 36 | 9% |
Other | 110 | 26% |
Unknown | 81 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 226 | 54% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 6% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 19 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 1% |
Other | 21 | 5% |
Unknown | 94 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 52. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 August 2023.
All research outputs
#821,981
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from New England Journal of Medicine
#8,630
of 32,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,112
of 182,163 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New England Journal of Medicine
#100
of 307 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 32,765 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 182,163 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 307 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.