↓ Skip to main content

A Roadmap and Best Practices for Organizations to Reduce Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of General Internal Medicine, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
policy
5 policy sources
twitter
22 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
225 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
293 Mendeley
Title
A Roadmap and Best Practices for Organizations to Reduce Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Health Care
Published in
Journal of General Internal Medicine, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11606-012-2082-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marshall H. Chin, Amanda R. Clarke, Robert S. Nocon, Alicia A. Casey, Anna P. Goddu, Nicole M. Keesecker, Scott C. Cook

Abstract

Over the past decade, researchers have shifted their focus from documenting health care disparities to identifying solutions to close the gap in care. Finding Answers: Disparities Research for Change, a national program of the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, is charged with identifying promising interventions to reduce disparities. Based on our work conducting systematic reviews of the literature, evaluating promising practices, and providing technical assistance to health care organizations, we present a roadmap for reducing racial and ethnic disparities in care. The roadmap outlines a dynamic process in which individual interventions are just one part. It highlights that organizations and providers need to take responsibility for reducing disparities, establish a general infrastructure and culture to improve quality, and integrate targeted disparities interventions into quality improvement efforts. Additionally, we summarize the major lessons learned through the Finding Answers program. We share best practices for implementing disparities interventions and synthesize cross-cutting themes from 12 systematic reviews of the literature. Our research shows that promising interventions frequently are culturally tailored to meet patients' needs, employ multidisciplinary teams of care providers, and target multiple leverage points along a patient's pathway of care. Health education that uses interactive techniques to deliver skills training appears to be more effective than traditional didactic approaches. Furthermore, patient navigation and engaging family and community members in the health care process may improve outcomes for minority patients. We anticipate that the roadmap and best practices will be useful for organizations, policymakers, and researchers striving to provide high-quality equitable care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 293 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 285 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 18%
Researcher 40 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 10%
Other 21 7%
Other 70 24%
Unknown 47 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 84 29%
Social Sciences 54 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 12%
Psychology 17 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 4%
Other 27 9%
Unknown 64 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2023.
All research outputs
#706,705
of 25,425,223 outputs
Outputs from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#558
of 8,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,523
of 178,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of General Internal Medicine
#3
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,425,223 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,194 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.