| Title |
Does Practice Make Perfect?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, January 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-007-9804-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A. M. Hogan, D. C. Winter |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Turkey | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Ukraine | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 15% |
| Researcher | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 8% |
| Other | 20 | 21% |
| Unknown | 19 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 24% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 12% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 8% |
| Psychology | 8 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 20 | 21% |
| Unknown | 21 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2018.
All research outputs
#5,306,642
of 24,920,664 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#1,765
of 7,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,002
of 171,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#5
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,920,664 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,072 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 171,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.