| Title |
Multicenter prospective study of sublobar resection for c-stage I non-small cell lung cancer patients unable to undergo lobectomy (KLSG-0801): complete republication
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, May 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11748-016-0662-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nobumasa Takahashi, Noriyoshi Sawabata, Masafumi Kawamura, Takashi Ohtsuka, Hirotoshi Horio, Hirozou Sakaguchi, Mitsuo Nakayama, Katsuo Yoshiya, Masayuki Chida, Eishin Hoshi |
| Abstract |
Local therapy for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is divided into surgical and radiation treatment, and given to patients unable to tolerate a lobectomy. A prospective phase II study of cases that received stereotactic body radio therapy (SBRT) (JCOG0403) revealed an overall 3-year survival rate (3-YSR) of 76.0 %, 3-year relapse free survival rate (3-YRFS) of 69.0 %, and rate of morbidity of grade 3 or greater of 9 %. However, few prospective multicenter studies have reported regarding surgery for high-risk stage I NSCLC patients. We investigated this issue in the setting of a prospective multicenter observational study. Thirty-two high-risk NSCLC patients (30 males, 2 females; median age 74 years, 61-85 years) were analyzed. Two (6.3 %) showed morbidity of grade 3 or greater, though there were no postoperative deaths. The margin local control rate was 97.0 % (surgical margin recurrence, 1) and local recurrence control rate was 75.0 % (ipsilateral thorax recurrence, 8), while the 3-YSR and 3-YRFS was 79.0 and 75.9 %, respectively. A sublobar pulmonary resection for patients unable to tolerate a lobectomy with stage I NSCLC was shown to be safe and provided results comparable with those of SBRT. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
| Researcher | 3 | 14% |
| Professor | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 45% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2016.
All research outputs
#13,724,124
of 23,267,128 outputs
Outputs from General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
#136
of 434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177,670
of 339,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
#4
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,267,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 434 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.