| Title |
RBDL: an efficient rigid-body dynamics library using recursive algorithms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Autonomous Robots, June 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10514-016-9574-0 |
| Authors |
Martin L. Felis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 67% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 116 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 27 | 23% |
| Researcher | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 22 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 62 | 53% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 26 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2016.
All research outputs
#12,899,167
of 22,876,619 outputs
Outputs from Autonomous Robots
#247
of 518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,907
of 339,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Autonomous Robots
#9
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,876,619 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 518 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.