| Title |
Oseltamivir for coronavirus illness: post-hoc exploratory analysis of an open-label, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial in European primary care from 2016 to 2018
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp20x711941 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Samuel Coenen, Alike W van der Velden, Daniela Cianci, Herman Goossens, Emily Bongard, Benjamin R Saville, Nina Gobat, Muireann de Paor, Margareta Ieven, Theo J Verheij, Christopher C Butler |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 35% |
| Belgium | 2 | 9% |
| United States | 2 | 9% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 65% |
| Scientists | 7 | 30% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 219 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 219 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 10% |
| Researcher | 16 | 7% |
| Other | 14 | 6% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 32 | 15% |
| Unknown | 102 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 5% |
| Psychology | 7 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 9% |
| Unknown | 108 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,103,275
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#497
of 4,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,764
of 434,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#13
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.