Title |
Why Don’t We Play Pandemic? Analog Gaming Communities in Lockdown
|
---|---|
Published in |
Leisure Sciences, June 2020
|
DOI | 10.1080/01490400.2020.1773986 |
Authors |
Matt Coward-Gibbs |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 6 | 75% |
Canada | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 39 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 15% |
Researcher | 5 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 13% |
Lecturer | 3 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 15% |
Unknown | 12 | 31% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 7 | 18% |
Psychology | 4 | 10% |
Computer Science | 3 | 8% |
Sports and Recreations | 3 | 8% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 5% |
Other | 8 | 21% |
Unknown | 12 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2020.
All research outputs
#5,657,109
of 23,217,343 outputs
Outputs from Leisure Sciences
#103
of 456 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,196
of 400,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Leisure Sciences
#22
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,217,343 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 456 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.