You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
『パーソナリティ研究』に採択される方法
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Japanese Journal of Personality, January 2016
|
| DOI | 10.2132/personality.25.1 |
| Authors |
加藤 司 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 18 | 37% |
| Philippines | 1 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 29 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 44 | 90% |
| Scientists | 5 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2017.
All research outputs
#1,278,900
of 25,610,986 outputs
Outputs from Japanese Journal of Personality
#6
of 291 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,594
of 401,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japanese Journal of Personality
#2
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,610,986 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 291 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 401,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.