↓ Skip to main content

ゴルフ場の活性化に向けたサービス・ドミナント・ロジックの活用

Overview of attention for article published in Japan Marketing Review, March 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
ゴルフ場の活性化に向けたサービス・ドミナント・ロジックの活用
Published in
Japan Marketing Review, March 2020
DOI 10.7222/marketingreview.2020.001
Authors

若林 省吾

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2021.
All research outputs
#13,967,701
of 24,357,902 outputs
Outputs from Japan Marketing Review
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,705
of 365,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Japan Marketing Review
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,357,902 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them