| Title |
The Transeurope Footrace Project: longitudinal data acquisition in a cluster randomized mobile MRI observational cohort study on 44 endurance runners at a 64-stage 4,486km transcontinental ultramarathon
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medicine, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1741-7015-10-78 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Uwe HW Schütz, Arno Schmidt-Trucksäss, Beat Knechtle, Jürgen Machann, Heike Wiedelbach, Martin Ehrhardt, Wolfgang Freund, Stefan Gröninger, Horst Brunner, Ingo Schulze, Hans-Jürgen Brambs, Christian Billich |
| Abstract |
The TransEurope FootRace 2009 (TEFR09) was one of the longest transcontinental ultramarathons with an extreme endurance physical load of running nearly 4,500 km in 64 days. The aim of this study was to assess the wide spectrum of adaptive responses in humans regarding the different tissues, organs and functional systems being exposed to such chronic physical endurance load with limited time for regeneration and resulting negative energy balance. A detailed description of the TEFR project and its implemented measuring methods in relation to the hypotheses are presented. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 18% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Portugal | 1 | 4% |
| Qatar | 1 | 4% |
| Spain | 1 | 4% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Jordan | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 19 | 68% |
| Scientists | 5 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 246 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 12% |
| Researcher | 27 | 11% |
| Professor | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 45 | 18% |
| Unknown | 66 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 22% |
| Sports and Recreations | 33 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 4% |
| Psychology | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 42 | 16% |
| Unknown | 86 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2016.
All research outputs
#726,811
of 24,516,705 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medicine
#505
of 3,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,569
of 167,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medicine
#8
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,516,705 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,785 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.