| Title |
Video consultations: quality, access, and equity in COVID and post-COVID general practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp20x710861 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
James Matheson, on behalf of the RCGP Health Inequalities Standing Group |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 36% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 43% |
| Scientists | 4 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 44 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 11% |
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Librarian | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 16% |
| Unknown | 17 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 17 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2020.
All research outputs
#1,877,243
of 23,217,343 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#939
of 4,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,210
of 400,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#24
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,217,343 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,346 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.