↓ Skip to main content

Pharmacologic Approaches to Weight Management: Recent Gains and Shortfalls in Combating Obesity

Overview of attention for article published in Current Atherosclerosis Reports, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Pharmacologic Approaches to Weight Management: Recent Gains and Shortfalls in Combating Obesity
Published in
Current Atherosclerosis Reports, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11883-016-0589-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katherine H. Saunders, Rekha B. Kumar, Leon I. Igel, Louis J. Aronne

Abstract

Obesity is a growing epidemic in the USA with over one third of adults presently classified as obese. Obesity-related comorbidities include many leading causes of preventable death such as heart disease, stroke, type 2 diabetes, and certain types of cancer. Modest weight loss of 5-10 % of body weight is sufficient to produce clinically relevant improvements in cardiovascular disease risk factors among patients with overweight and obesity. Until recently, there were limited pharmacologic options approved by the Food and Drug Administration to treat obesity. Phentermine/topiramate ER and lorcaserin were approved in 2012, and naltrexone SR/bupropion SR and liraglutide 3.0 mg were approved in 2014. This article reviews recent literature in the field of Obesity Medicine and highlights important findings from clinical trials. Future directions in the pharmacologic management of obesity are presented along with new diabetes medications that promote weight loss and reduce cardiovascular mortality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Researcher 4 7%
Other 3 6%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 20 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 28%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 22 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2016.
All research outputs
#14,265,823
of 22,876,619 outputs
Outputs from Current Atherosclerosis Reports
#534
of 766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,145
of 317,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Atherosclerosis Reports
#8
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,876,619 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,717 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.