↓ Skip to main content

Lost in plain sight: revealing central flow process in Christaller’s original central place systems

Overview of attention for article published in Regional Studies, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Lost in plain sight: revealing central flow process in Christaller’s original central place systems
Published in
Regional Studies, June 2020
DOI 10.1080/00343404.2020.1772965
Authors

Peter J. Taylor, Michael Hoyler

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Researcher 2 8%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 12 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 6 25%
Arts and Humanities 2 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 12 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2021.
All research outputs
#3,185,909
of 23,217,343 outputs
Outputs from Regional Studies
#339
of 1,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,336
of 400,329 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Regional Studies
#12
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,217,343 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,716 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,329 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.