| Title |
Accuracy of plethysmographic indices as predictors of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-012-2621-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Claudio Sandroni, Fabio Cavallaro, Cristina Marano, Chiara Falcone, Paolo De Santis, Massimo Antonelli |
| Abstract |
To systematically review the accuracy of the variation in pulse oxymetry plethysmographic waveform amplitude (∆POP) and the Pleth Variability Index (PVI) as predictors of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated adults. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 33% |
| Spain | 1 | 17% |
| France | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 132 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 23 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 13% |
| Researcher | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 10 | 7% |
| Other | 42 | 30% |
| Unknown | 21 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 81 | 58% |
| Unspecified | 8 | 6% |
| Engineering | 8 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 25 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2012.
All research outputs
#7,931,332
of 23,878,777 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,993
of 5,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,223
of 166,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#16
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,878,777 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,159 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.6. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.