| Title |
Human chorionic gonadotropin is of no value in the management of obesity.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Canadian Medical Association Journal, May 1983
|
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
C L Birmingham, K C Smith |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 20% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 10% |
| Brazil | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 30% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 10% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 40% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 10% |
| Sports and Recreations | 1 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2019.
All research outputs
#1,490,955
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#1,894
of 9,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112
of 7,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,453 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 7,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them