You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Towards a Theory of Legal Animal Rights: Simple and Fundamental Rights
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1093/ojls/gqaa007 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Saskia Stucki |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 100 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 17 | 17% |
| Germany | 6 | 6% |
| United States | 4 | 4% |
| Belgium | 3 | 3% |
| Japan | 3 | 3% |
| Ecuador | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Finland | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 16 | 16% |
| Unknown | 43 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 77 | 77% |
| Scientists | 17 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 82 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 11 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 12% |
| Researcher | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 36 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 20 | 24% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 5 | 6% |
| Philosophy | 5 | 6% |
| Arts and Humanities | 5 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Unknown | 35 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2024.
All research outputs
#456,613
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Oxford Journal of Legal Studies
#6
of 450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,224
of 437,090 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oxford Journal of Legal Studies
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,090 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them