↓ Skip to main content

The Mental Health Education Gap among Primary Care Providers in Rural Nepal

Overview of attention for article published in Academic Psychiatry, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Title
The Mental Health Education Gap among Primary Care Providers in Rural Nepal
Published in
Academic Psychiatry, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s40596-016-0572-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bibhav Acharya, Soniya Hirachan, Jeffery S. Mandel, Craig van Dyke

Abstract

In low- and middle-income countries, the majority of individuals with mental illness go untreated largely because of a severe shortage of mental health professionals. Global initiatives to close the mental health treatment gap focus on primary care providers delivering this care. For this to be effective, primary care providers require the skills to assess, diagnose, and treat patients with mental illness. To assess primary care providers' training and experience in caring for mental health patients, the authors conducted five focus groups at three isolated district hospitals in rural Nepal where there was no access to mental health professionals. Primary care providers reported limited training, lack of knowledge and skills, and discomfort in delivering mental health care. To address the mental health education gap, primary care providers in Nepal, and perhaps other low- and middle-income countries, require more training during both undergraduate and graduate medical education.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Singapore 1 <1%
Unknown 104 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 19%
Student > Bachelor 18 17%
Researcher 16 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 5%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 27 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 19%
Psychology 15 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 13%
Social Sciences 7 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 12 11%
Unknown 35 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2022.
All research outputs
#2,213,625
of 23,885,338 outputs
Outputs from Academic Psychiatry
#96
of 1,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,890
of 343,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Academic Psychiatry
#2
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,885,338 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,478 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.