You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Defining the gap between electrographic seizure burden, clinical expression and staff recognition of neonatal seizures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition, July 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1136/adc.2005.086314 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
D M Murray, G B Boylan, I Ali, C A Ryan, B P Murphy, S Connolly |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 80% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 193 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 35 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 10% |
| Other | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 49 | 25% |
| Unknown | 39 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 84 | 42% |
| Neuroscience | 17 | 9% |
| Engineering | 13 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 11% |
| Unknown | 46 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2018.
All research outputs
#3,692,589
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition
#566
of 2,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,151
of 80,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Disease in Childhood -- Fetal & Neonatal Edition
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,071 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 80,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.