| Title |
The Global Phosphorylation Landscape of SARS-CoV-2 Infection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Cell, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cell.2020.06.034 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mehdi Bouhaddou, Danish Memon, Bjoern Meyer, Kris M White, Veronica V Rezelj, Miguel Correa Marrero, Benjamin J Polacco, James E Melnyk, Svenja Ulferts, Robyn M Kaake, Jyoti Batra, Alicia L Richards, Erica Stevenson, David E Gordon, Ajda Rojc, Kirsten Obernier, Jacqueline M Fabius, Margaret Soucheray, Lisa Miorin, Elena Moreno, Cassandra Koh, Quang Dinh Tran, Alexandra Hardy, Rémy Robinot, Thomas Vallet, Benjamin E Nilsson-Payant, Claudia Hernandez-Armenta, Alistair Dunham, Sebastian Weigang, Julian Knerr, Maya Modak, Diego Quintero, Yuan Zhou, Aurelien Dugourd, Alberto Valdeolivas, Trupti Patil, Qiongyu Li, Ruth Hüttenhain, Merve Cakir, Monita Muralidharan, Minkyu Kim, Gwendolyn Jang, Beril Tutuncuoglu, Joseph Hiatt, Jeffrey Z Guo, Jiewei Xu, Sophia Bouhaddou, Christopher J P Mathy, Anna Gaulton, Emma J Manners, Eloy Félix, Ying Shi, Marisa Goff, Jean K Lim, Timothy McBride, Michael C O'Neal, Yiming Cai, Jason C J Chang, David J Broadhurst, Saker Klippsten, Emmie De Wit, Andrew R Leach, Tanja Kortemme, Brian Shoichet, Melanie Ott, Julio Saez-Rodriguez, Benjamin R tenOever, R Dyche Mullins, Elizabeth R Fischer, Georg Kochs, Robert Grosse, Adolfo García-Sastre, Marco Vignuzzi, Jeffery R Johnson, Kevan M Shokat, Danielle L Swaney, Pedro Beltrao, Nevan J Krogan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 720 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 189 | 26% |
| United Kingdom | 62 | 9% |
| Germany | 29 | 4% |
| Spain | 14 | 2% |
| France | 14 | 2% |
| India | 13 | 2% |
| Mexico | 11 | 2% |
| Japan | 10 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 8 | 1% |
| Other | 84 | 12% |
| Unknown | 286 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 446 | 62% |
| Scientists | 230 | 32% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 27 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 17 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 869 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 869 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 150 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 136 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 88 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 65 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 41 | 5% |
| Other | 135 | 16% |
| Unknown | 254 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 216 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 88 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 66 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 7% |
| Chemistry | 34 | 4% |
| Other | 115 | 13% |
| Unknown | 285 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1253. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2024.
All research outputs
#11,111
of 25,793,330 outputs
Outputs from Cell
#91
of 17,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#557
of 434,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell
#9
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,793,330 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,292 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 59.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,588 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.