| Title |
Impact of an enhanced recovery program on short-term outcomes after scheduled laparoscopic colon resection
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Surgical Endoscopy, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00464-012-2446-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicoleta O. Kolozsvari, Giovanni Capretti, Pepa Kaneva, Amy Neville, Franco Carli, Sender Liberman, Patrick Charlebois, Barry Stein, Melina C. Vassiliou, Gerald M. Fried, Liane S. Feldman |
| Abstract |
Both enhanced recovery programs (ERP) and laparoscopy can reduce complications and length of stay (LOS) in colon surgery. We investigated whether ERP further improved the short-term outcomes of scheduled laparoscopic colectomies. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Poland | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 52 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 13% |
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 9% |
| Other | 8 | 15% |
| Unknown | 12 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 50% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Psychology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 13 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2013.
All research outputs
#15,247,248
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#3,772
of 5,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#104,122
of 163,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#47
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,991 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.