↓ Skip to main content

Cancer cachexia alters intracellular surfactant metabolism but not total alveolar surface area

Overview of attention for article published in Histochemistry and Cell Biology, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
Title
Cancer cachexia alters intracellular surfactant metabolism but not total alveolar surface area
Published in
Histochemistry and Cell Biology, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00418-012-0995-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tilman Graulich, Suman Kumar Das, Gabriela Krasteva, Clemens Ruppert, Lars Wessels, Gerald Hoefler, Christian Mühlfeld

Abstract

Dyspnoea is frequently observed in cancer cachectic patients. Little is known whether this is accompanied by structural or functional alterations of the lung. We hypothesized that in analogy to calorie restriction cancer cachexia leads to loss of alveolar surface area and surfactant. Mice were subjected to subcutaneous injection of Lewis lung carcinoma cells (tumour group, TG) or saline (control group, CG). Twenty-one days later blood samples and the lungs were taken. Using design-based stereology, the alveolar surface area and the lamellar body (Lb) content were quantified. Messenger RNA expression of surfactant proteins, ABCA3 and various growth factors was investigated by quantitative RT-PCR. Intraalveolar surfactant subtype composition was analyzed by differential centrifugation. TG mice showed reduced body weight and anaemia but no reduction of lung volume or alveolar surface area. The volume of Lb was significantly reduced and mRNA levels of ABCA3 transporter tended to be lower in TG versus CG. Surfactant protein expression and the ratio between active and inactive intraalveolar surfactant subtypes were not altered in TG. Growth factor mRNA levels were not different between CG and TG lungs but the tumour expressed growth factor mRNA. Vascular endothelial growth factor was significantly enhanced in blood plasma. The present study demonstrates structural alterations of the lung associated with cancer cachexia. These include reduction of Lb content despite normal intraalveolar surfactant and alveolar surface area. The pulmonary phenotype of the cancer cachectic mouse differs from the calorie restricted mouse possibly due to growth factors released from the tumour tissue.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 31%
Other 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 5 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 31%
Neuroscience 2 13%
Computer Science 2 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2012.
All research outputs
#21,697,638
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Histochemistry and Cell Biology
#774
of 926 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,975
of 166,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Histochemistry and Cell Biology
#8
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 926 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 166,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.