You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
White sucker Catostomus commersonii respond to conspecific and sea lamprey Petromyzon marinus alarm cues but not potential predator cues
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Great Lakes Research, August 2016
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.jglr.2016.04.003 |
Authors |
Ethan J. Jordbro, Richard T. Di Rocco, István Imre, Nicholas S. Johnson, Grant E. Brown |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 50% |
Researcher | 2 | 20% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 10% |
Professor | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 1 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 60% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 10% |
Engineering | 1 | 10% |
Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 June 2016.
All research outputs
#20,332,117
of 22,876,619 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Great Lakes Research
#1,480
of 1,676 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#321,193
of 366,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Great Lakes Research
#12
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,876,619 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,676 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 366,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.