↓ Skip to main content

Management of infected pancreatic necrosis using retroperitoneal necrosectomy with flexible endoscope: 10 years of experience

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Endoscopy, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Management of infected pancreatic necrosis using retroperitoneal necrosectomy with flexible endoscope: 10 years of experience
Published in
Surgical Endoscopy, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s00464-012-2455-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gregorio Castellanos, Antonio Piñero, Laura A. Doig, Andrés Serrano, Matilde Fuster, Vicente Bixquert

Abstract

This study was designed to provide our experience in the management of infected and drained pancreatic necrosis using the retroperitoneal approach.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 18%
Other 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Student > Bachelor 3 11%
Researcher 2 7%
Other 8 29%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 64%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 7%
Unspecified 1 4%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Computer Science 1 4%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2018.
All research outputs
#7,171,608
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Endoscopy
#1,600
of 5,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,338
of 163,884 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Endoscopy
#25
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,991 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,884 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.