↓ Skip to main content

Prognostic and predictive impacts of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes differ between Triple-negative and HER2-positive breast cancers treated with standard systemic therapies

Overview of attention for article published in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Prognostic and predictive impacts of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes differ between Triple-negative and HER2-positive breast cancers treated with standard systemic therapies
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s10549-016-3848-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Akira I. Hida, Yasuaki Sagara, Daisuke Yotsumoto, Shuichi Kanemitsu, Junko Kawano, Shinichi Baba, Yoshiaki Rai, Yumi Oshiro, Kenjiro Aogi, Yoshiaki Sagara, Yasuyo Ohi

Abstract

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have potential value for stratifying the treatment of breast cancer (BC), though their precise use remains unclear. We aimed to investigate the utility of TILs using an alternative approach in different settings. We reviewed patients with triple-negative (TN) or human epithelial growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive invasive ductal carcinomas from a single institutional cohort and classified archived hematoxylin-eosin-stained samples in terms of TIL score as low (<10 %), intermediate, and high (>50 %). The prognostic and predictive values of TILs were analyzed retrospectively in both adjuvant and neo-adjuvant settings. In the adjuvant setting, the presence of TILs at primary surgery was a significant favorable prognostic factor among 154 TNBCs [relapse-free survival (RFS): p = 0.015], but not among 183 HER2+ BCs (RFS: p = 0.097). The TNBC low-TIL group tended to relapse earlier. In the neo-adjuvant setting, detection of TILs on biopsy before primary systemic therapy was associated with the ratio of patients achieving pathological complete response among 48 TNBCs (p = 0.024), but not among 58 HER2+ BCs (p = 0.30). The presence of TILs in surgical specimens after systemic therapy had prognostic value in HER2+ BC (RFS: p = 0.007). The impact of TILs differs between patients with TN and HER2+ BC treated with standard therapies. Our three-grade scale for TILs may contribute to our understanding of the importance of the tumor microenvironment in routine practice. TILs after primary systemic therapy may be useful for the further stratification of treatment of HER2+ BC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 76 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Student > Master 10 13%
Researcher 7 9%
Other 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 22 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 49%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 22 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2016.
All research outputs
#20,332,117
of 22,876,619 outputs
Outputs from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#4,110
of 4,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#291,913
of 339,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
#77
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,876,619 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,659 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.