You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of communicating DNA based risk assessments for Crohn’s disease on smoking cessation: randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Medical Journal, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmj.e4708 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gareth J Hollands, Sophia C L Whitwell, Richard A Parker, Natalie J Prescott, Alastair Forbes, Jeremy Sanderson, Christopher G Mathew, Cathryn M Lewis, Sally Watts, Stephen Sutton, David Armstrong, Ann Louise Kinmonth, A Toby Prevost, Theresa M Marteau |
| Abstract |
To test the hypothesis that communicating risk of developing Crohn's disease based on genotype and that stopping smoking can reduce this risk, motivates behaviour change among smokers at familial risk. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
| Argentina | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Italy | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 46% |
| Scientists | 11 | 46% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 115 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 16% |
| Researcher | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 31 | 26% |
| Unknown | 19 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 45% |
| Psychology | 12 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 5% |
| Engineering | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 22 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 August 2014.
All research outputs
#1,537,613
of 25,411,814 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#15,021
of 64,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,712
of 177,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#106
of 782 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,411,814 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 64,530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 45.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 782 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.