↓ Skip to main content

The role of biofilm on orthopaedic implants: the “Holy Grail” of post-traumatic infection management?

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
Title
The role of biofilm on orthopaedic implants: the “Holy Grail” of post-traumatic infection management?
Published in
European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, June 2016
DOI 10.1007/s00068-016-0694-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. Mauffrey, B. Herbert, H. Young, M. L. Wilson, M. Hake, P. F. Stahel

Abstract

The development of post-traumatic infection is potentially a limb threatening condition. The orthopaedic trauma literature lags behind the research performed by our arthroplasty colleagues on the topic of implant-related infections. Surgical site infections in the setting of a recent ORIF are notoriously hard to eradicate due to biofilm formation around the implant. This bacteria-friendly, dynamic, living pluri-organism structure has the ability to morph and adapt to virtually any environment with the aim to maintain the causative organism alive. The challenges are twofold: establishing an accurate diagnosis with speciation/sensitivity and eradicating the infection. Multiple strategies have been researched to improve diagnostic accuracy, to prevent biofilm formation on orthopaedic implants, to mobilize/detach or weaken the biofilm or to target specifically bacteria embedded in the biofilm. The purpose of our paper is to review the patho-physiology of this mysterious pluri-cellular structure and to summarize some of the most pertinent research performed to improve diagnostic and treatment strategies in biofilm-related infections.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 41 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 20%
Student > Bachelor 6 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 12 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 32%
Materials Science 3 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 15 37%