You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The misuse of “duty of care” as justification for non-consensual coercive treatment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Law & Psychiatry, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ijlp.2020.101598 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Scott Lamont, Cameron Stewart, Mary Chiarella |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 57% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 57% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 8 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 14% |
| Unknown | 8 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2023.
All research outputs
#6,853,071
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Law & Psychiatry
#357
of 966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,689
of 433,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Law & Psychiatry
#22
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.