You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Theory and practice of conservancies: evidence from wildlife management areas in Tanzania
|
---|---|
Published in |
Erdkunde, June 2020
|
DOI | 10.3112/erdkunde.2020.02.03 |
Authors |
Fidelcastor F. Kimario, Nina Botha, Alex Kisingo, Hubert Job |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 103 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 16% |
Student > Master | 10 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
Professor | 5 | 5% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 4% |
Other | 13 | 13% |
Unknown | 49 | 48% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 18 | 17% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 6 | 6% |
Arts and Humanities | 5 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
Other | 12 | 12% |
Unknown | 52 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2020.
All research outputs
#22,771,990
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Erdkunde
#86
of 87 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#374,540
of 433,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Erdkunde
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 87 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them