↓ Skip to main content

A classification of compounds in American Sign Language: an evaluation of the Bisetto and Scalise framework

Overview of attention for article published in Morphology, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#48 of 100)

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
Title
A classification of compounds in American Sign Language: an evaluation of the Bisetto and Scalise framework
Published in
Morphology, July 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11525-012-9205-1
Authors

Mary Lou Vercellotti, David R. Mortensen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 35%
Researcher 3 15%
Student > Master 3 15%
Professor 1 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Linguistics 14 70%
Computer Science 1 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 5%
Unknown 4 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2012.
All research outputs
#15,247,248
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from Morphology
#48
of 100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,348
of 143,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Morphology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 100 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them