↓ Skip to main content

Territorial traps in controlling the COVID-19 pandemic

Overview of attention for article published in Dialogues in Human Geography, June 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
Title
Territorial traps in controlling the COVID-19 pandemic
Published in
Dialogues in Human Geography, June 2020
DOI 10.1177/2043820620935682
Authors

Fenglong Wang, Sainan Zou, Yungang Liu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 20%
Lecturer 6 13%
Researcher 6 13%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 7%
Other 11 24%
Unknown 6 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 17 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 11%
Arts and Humanities 3 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 7%
Environmental Science 2 4%
Other 7 16%
Unknown 8 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2020.
All research outputs
#18,730,833
of 23,217,343 outputs
Outputs from Dialogues in Human Geography
#318
of 376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#301,197
of 399,732 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dialogues in Human Geography
#46
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,217,343 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 376 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,732 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.