↓ Skip to main content

Relationship Factors Associated with HIV Risk Among a Sample of Gay Male Couples

Overview of attention for article published in AIDS and Behavior, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
86 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
Title
Relationship Factors Associated with HIV Risk Among a Sample of Gay Male Couples
Published in
AIDS and Behavior, May 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10461-011-9976-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jason W. Mitchell, S. Marie Harvey, Donna Champeau, David W. Seal

Abstract

More HIV prevention research is needed to better understand how relationship factors may affect sexual risk behaviors among gay male couples. Our cross-sectional study collected dyadic data from 144 gay male couples to examine which relationship factors and characteristics were associated with men having UAI with a secondary sex partner. We targeted male couples by using a variety of recruitment strategies. Multilevel random-effects logistic regression modeling was used to examine which factors were predictive of men in gay couples who had UAI with a secondary sex partner. Analyses revealed that men were less likely to have had UAI with a secondary sex partner if they reported being in a strictly monogamous relationship, receiving an HIV test within the previous 3 months, and being committed to their sexual agreement. Future HIV prevention interventions must consider how relationship factors may influence sexual risk behaviors among gay male couples.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 60 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 21%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 5%
Other 12 19%
Unknown 12 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 16 25%
Psychology 12 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 13 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2022.
All research outputs
#4,631,261
of 25,714,183 outputs
Outputs from AIDS and Behavior
#656
of 3,700 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,153
of 124,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from AIDS and Behavior
#7
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,714,183 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,700 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.