↓ Skip to main content

Costs and Cost-Effectiveness of Carotid Stenting Versus Endarterectomy for Patients at Standard Surgical Risk

Overview of attention for article published in Stroke, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Costs and Cost-Effectiveness of Carotid Stenting Versus Endarterectomy for Patients at Standard Surgical Risk
Published in
Stroke, July 2012
DOI 10.1161/strokeaha.112.661355
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katherine R. Vilain, Elizabeth A. Magnuson, Haiyan Li, Wayne M. Clark, Richard J. Begg, Albert D. Sam, W. Charles Sternbergh, Fred A. Weaver, William A. Gray, Jenifer H. Voeks, Thomas G. Brott, David J. Cohen

Abstract

The Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST) demonstrated similar rates of the primary composite end point between carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA), although the risk of stroke was higher with CAS, and the risk of myocardial infarction was higher with CEA. Given the large number of patients who are candidates for these procedures, an understanding of their relative cost and cost-effectiveness may have important implications for health care policy and treatment guidelines.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 108 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 29 26%
Student > Master 11 10%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Other 8 7%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 21 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 4%
Sports and Recreations 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Other 13 12%
Unknown 24 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2012.
All research outputs
#16,046,765
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Stroke
#9,620
of 12,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,704
of 178,092 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Stroke
#69
of 145 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,372 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.6. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,092 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 145 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.