↓ Skip to main content

Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Identifies a Subset of Crizotinib‐Responsive ALK‐Rearranged Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer Not Detected by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization

Overview of attention for article published in Oncologist, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 X users
patent
22 patents
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
107 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Identifies a Subset of Crizotinib‐Responsive ALK‐Rearranged Non‐Small Cell Lung Cancer Not Detected by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization
Published in
Oncologist, May 2016
DOI 10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0497
Pubmed ID
Authors

Siraj M. Ali, Thomas Hensing, Alexa B. Schrock, Justin Allen, Eric Sanford, Kyle Gowen, Atul Kulkarni, Jie He, James H. Suh, Doron Lipson, Julia A. Elvin, Roman Yelensky, Zachary Chalmers, Juliann Chmielecki, Nir Peled, Samuel J. Klempner, Kashif Firozvi, Garrett M. Frampton, Julian R. Molina, Smitha Menon, Julie R. Brahmer, Heber MacMahon, Jan Nowak, Sai‐Hong Ignatius Ou, Marjorie Zauderer, Marc Ladanyi, Maureen Zakowski, Neil Fischbach, Jeffrey S. Ross, Phil J. Stephens, Vincent A. Miller, Heather Wakelee, Shridar Ganesan, Ravi Salgia

Abstract

For patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to benefit from ALK inhibitors, sensitive and specific detection of ALK genomic rearrangements is needed. ALK break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved and standard-of-care diagnostic assay, but identification of ALK rearrangements by other methods reported in NSCLC cases that tested negative for ALK rearrangements by FISH suggests a significant false-negative rate. We report here a large series of NSCLC cases assayed by hybrid-capture-based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) in the course of clinical care. Hybrid-capture-based CGP using next-generation sequencing was performed in the course of clinical care of 1,070 patients with advanced lung cancer. Each tumor sample was evaluated for all classes of genomic alterations, including base-pair substitutions, insertions/deletions, copy number alterations and rearrangements, as well as fusions/rearrangements. A total of 47 patients (4.4%) were found to harbor ALK rearrangements, of whom 41 had an EML4-ALK fusion, and 6 had other fusion partners, including 3 previously unreported rearrangement events: EIF2AK-ALK, PPM1B-ALK, and PRKAR1A-ALK. Of 41 patients harboring ALK rearrangements, 31 had prior FISH testing results available. Of these, 20 were ALK FISH positive, and 11 (35%) were ALK FISH negative. Of the latter 11 patients, 9 received crizotinib based on the CGP results, and 7 achieved a response with median duration of 17 months. Comprehensive genomic profiling detected canonical ALK rearrangements and ALK rearrangements with noncanonical fusion partners in a subset of patients with NSCLC with previously negative ALK FISH results. In this series, such patients had durable responses to ALK inhibitors, comparable to historical response rates for ALK FISH-positive cases. Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) that includes hybrid capture and specific baiting of intron 19 of ALK is a highly sensitive, alternative method for identification of drug-sensitive ALK fusions in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who had previously tested negative using standard ALK fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) diagnostic assays. Given the proven benefit of treatment with crizotinib and second-generation ALK inhibitors in patients with ALK fusions, CGP should be considered in patients with NSCLC, including those who have tested negative for other alterations, including negative results using ALK FISH testing.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 88 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 15 17%
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 28 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 31 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,032,276
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Oncologist
#412
of 3,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,514
of 353,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Oncologist
#9
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,985 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.