↓ Skip to main content

Role of cis-Monounsaturated Fatty Acids in the Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Current Atherosclerosis Reports, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
Title
Role of cis-Monounsaturated Fatty Acids in the Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease
Published in
Current Atherosclerosis Reports, May 2016
DOI 10.1007/s11883-016-0597-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter J. Joris, Ronald P. Mensink

Abstract

The effects of cis-monounsaturated fatty acids (cis-MUFAs) on the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD) and on CHD mortality are not clear. Also, dietary recommendations for cis-MUFA as derived by various organizations are not in agreement. Earlier studies have mainly focused on the effects of cis-MUFA on serum lipids and lipoproteins. More recent studies, however, have also addressed effects of cis-MUFA on other non-traditional CHD risk markers such as vascular function markers, postprandial vascular function, and energy intake and metabolism. Although well-designed randomized controlled trials with CHD events as endpoints are missing, several large prospective cohort studies have recently been published on the relationship between cis-MUFA and CHD risk. The aim of this paper is to review these new studies that have been published in the last 3 years on the effects of cis-MUFA on cardiovascular risk markers and CHD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 116 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 18%
Researcher 15 13%
Student > Master 11 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 6%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 36 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 5%
Chemistry 5 4%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 43 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,658,087
of 25,391,701 outputs
Outputs from Current Atherosclerosis Reports
#157
of 860 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,013
of 348,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Atherosclerosis Reports
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,391,701 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 860 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.