| Title |
Randomized controlled trial of postoperative exercise rehabilitation program after lumbar spine fusion: study protocol
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-13-123 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sami Tarnanen, Marko H Neva, Joost Dekker, Keijo Häkkinen, Kimmo Vihtonen, Liisa Pekkanen, Arja Häkkinen |
| Abstract |
Lumbar spine fusion (LSF) effectively decreases pain and disability in specific spinal disorders; however, the disability rate following surgery remains high. This, combined with the fact that in Western countries the number of LSF surgeries is increasing rapidly it is important to develop rehabilitation interventions that improve outcomes. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 290 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 283 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 44 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 9% |
| Researcher | 20 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 20 | 7% |
| Other | 62 | 21% |
| Unknown | 85 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 71 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 47 | 16% |
| Sports and Recreations | 32 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 30 | 10% |
| Unknown | 94 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2012.
All research outputs
#18,310,549
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#3,110
of 4,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,713
of 163,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#45
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,023 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.