| Title |
Epidemiology and cost analysis of pharmacist interventions at Ghent University Hospital
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, July 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11096-012-9676-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Barbara O. M. Claus, Fien M. R. Vandeputte, Hugo Robays |
| Abstract |
Performing bedside clinical recommendations is important for the prevention of adverse drug events. From an economic perspective, the economic value of adverse drug event avoidance needs to be weighed against the labour costs of pharmacists. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Finland | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Egypt | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 50 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 19% |
| Researcher | 9 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 7 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 35% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 16 | 30% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2012.
All research outputs
#18,310,549
of 22,671,366 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#867
of 1,071 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,755
of 163,942 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy
#19
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,671,366 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,071 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,942 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.