↓ Skip to main content

Synchronizing to auditory and tactile metronomes: a test of the auditory-motor enhancement hypothesis

Overview of attention for article published in Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, May 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
Title
Synchronizing to auditory and tactile metronomes: a test of the auditory-motor enhancement hypothesis
Published in
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, May 2016
DOI 10.3758/s13423-016-1067-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paolo Ammirante, Aniruddh D. Patel, Frank A. Russo

Abstract

Humans show a striking advantage for synchronizing movements with discretely timed auditory metronomes (e.g., clicking sounds) over temporally matched visual metronomes (e.g., flashing lights), suggesting enhanced auditory-motor coupling for rhythmic processing. Does the auditory advantage persist for other modalities (not just vision)? Here, nonmusicians finger tapped to the beat of auditory, tactile, and bimodal metronomes. Stimulus magnitude and rhythmic complexity were also manipulated. In conditions involving a large area of stimulation and simple rhythmic sequences, tactile synchronization closely matched auditory. Although this finding shows a limitation to the hypothesis of enhanced auditory-motor coupling for rhythmic processing, other findings clearly support it. First, there was a robust advantage with auditory information for synchronization with complex rhythm sequences; moreover, in complex sequences a measure of error correction was found only when auditory information was present. Second, higher order grouping was evident only when auditory information was present.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 91 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 26%
Researcher 16 17%
Student > Master 14 15%
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 13 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 29 31%
Neuroscience 21 23%
Linguistics 5 5%
Arts and Humanities 5 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 18 19%