Title |
Carbon leakage revisited: unilateral climate policy with directed technical change
|
---|---|
Published in |
Environmental and Resource Economics, March 2007
|
DOI | 10.1007/s10640-007-9091-x |
Authors |
Corrado Di Maria, Edwin van der Werf |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 3 | 2% |
United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Ireland | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 120 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 22% |
Researcher | 21 | 16% |
Student > Master | 16 | 12% |
Professor | 8 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
Other | 23 | 18% |
Unknown | 24 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 57 | 44% |
Environmental Science | 14 | 11% |
Social Sciences | 9 | 7% |
Engineering | 6 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 3% |
Other | 7 | 5% |
Unknown | 32 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2017.
All research outputs
#3,599,056
of 24,397,600 outputs
Outputs from Environmental and Resource Economics
#274
of 1,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,389
of 79,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental and Resource Economics
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,397,600 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,016 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.