You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The influence of differing protected area status and environmental factors on the macroinvertebrate fauna of temperate austral wetlands
|
---|---|
Published in |
Global Ecology and Conservation, July 2015
|
DOI | 10.1016/j.gecco.2015.07.007 |
Authors |
Toni Furlonge, Fiona Dyer, Jenny Davis |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 2 | 5% |
Italy | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 41 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 13 | 30% |
Researcher | 8 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
Lecturer | 2 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 14% |
Unknown | 7 | 16% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 16 | 36% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 30% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
Other | 4 | 9% |
Unknown | 8 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2016.
All research outputs
#15,377,214
of 22,876,619 outputs
Outputs from Global Ecology and Conservation
#1,038
of 1,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,987
of 263,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Global Ecology and Conservation
#20
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,876,619 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,323 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.5. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.