You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Challenges of Using Citizen Reporting to Improve Public Services: A Field Experiment on Solid Waste Services in Uganda
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1093/jopart/muaa026 |
| Authors |
Mark T Buntaine, Patrick Hunnicutt, Polycarp Komakech |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 25% |
| Denmark | 1 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 6% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 6% |
| Sweden | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 7 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 10 | 63% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 66 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 66 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Researcher | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 31 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 18 | 27% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 29 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,849,312
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory
#175
of 770 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,007
of 434,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 770 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.