↓ Skip to main content

Conservative treatments for tennis elbow—do subgroups of patients respond differently?

Overview of attention for article published in Rheumatology, August 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
152 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Conservative treatments for tennis elbow—do subgroups of patients respond differently?
Published in
Rheumatology, August 2007
DOI 10.1093/rheumatology/kem192
Pubmed ID
Authors

L. Bisset, N. Smidt, D. A. Van der Windt, L. M. Bouter, G. Jull, P. Brooks, B. Vicenzino

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 152 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Guatemala 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 146 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 32 21%
Student > Bachelor 22 14%
Student > Postgraduate 17 11%
Other 14 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 6%
Other 36 24%
Unknown 22 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 55%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 11%
Sports and Recreations 17 11%
Social Sciences 2 1%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 <1%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 28 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2012.
All research outputs
#8,499,896
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Rheumatology
#3,451
of 7,538 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,373
of 83,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rheumatology
#10
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,538 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.