| Title |
Driving saccade to pursuit using image motion
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Computer Vision, November 1995
|
| DOI | 10.1007/bf01539627 |
| Authors |
David W. Murray, Kevin J. Bradshaw, Philip F. McLauchlan, Ian D. Reid, Paul M. Sharkey |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 10% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 5% |
| Spain | 2 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Russia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 30 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 25% |
| Researcher | 9 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 15% |
| Professor | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 3 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 19 | 48% |
| Engineering | 7 | 18% |
| Psychology | 2 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2019.
All research outputs
#7,484,429
of 22,876,619 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Computer Vision
#391
of 1,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,349
of 25,367 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Computer Vision
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,876,619 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 25,367 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them